DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
JET
Docket No. NRO997-14
30 Jun 14
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 30 June 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinion furnished by CNRC Memo 1133 Ser N3 of 14 May
14, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In making this determination, the Board
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Your application, essentially, claims “I notified my recruiter
of my degree prior to leaving for basic training, but he
informed me to submit the required paperwork once I compleated
[SIC] basic training”. However, you provided no evidence to
support this statement. Further review of your record shows
that the recruiter determined that the transcripts you did
submit were not from a institution listed on the National
Accreditation Board or the American Association of Collegiate
Registrars and Admissions Officers as is required for
-advancement to be granted if eligible. The Board concurred with
the advisory opinion that per COMNAVCRUITCOMINST 1130.83
‘Retroactive advancements are not authorized”. The Board also
Docket No. NRO997-14
determined that you did not’ meet the eligibility requirements
based upon your transcripts. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT D. ALMAN
Acting Executive Director
Enclosure: CNRC Memo 1133 Ser N3 of 14 May 14
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2777 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting-in executive session, considered your application on 30 June 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC Memo 1133 Ser N3 of 14 Apr 14, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, *the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7220 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 March 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of - probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10116 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicabie statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 dtd 18 Dec 12 and CNRC Memo 1133 Ser N3 dtd 25 Apr 13,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07041-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 12/06437 of 23 August opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1 133 SER 2001, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1325 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC Memo 1133 Ser N32 of 15 Apr 14, a copy of which is attached. However, the Board agreed with the advisory opinion that there was no evidence found to indicate that you had completed three years of JROTC as is required...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00686-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8536 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC Memo 1133 Ser N32 of 6 May 14, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the,zburden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3190 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0396 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC Memo 1133 Ser N323 of 25 Mar 14, a copy of which is attached and was previously sent to you for comments to which you failed to respond. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05465-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. 5465-08 14 Oct 08 Dear